A prominent pro-life organization is taking decisive legal action against leftist activists who deliberately misappropriated their trademarked logo to promote abortion in New Mexico. The situation exemplifies the increasingly aggressive tactics employed by abortion advocates in their attempts to undermine pro-life messaging.
The controversy centers on Pro Choice Las Cruces, an abortion advocacy group that blatantly copied and modified the trademarked logo of 40 Days for Life, a national pro-life organization. The pro-abortion group made minimal alterations to the original design, merely adding reproductive imagery and changing the text from “40 Days for Life” to “40 Days for Choice,” while also modifying the organization’s motto to promote their opposing message.
This intellectual property violation occurs in Las Cruces, New Mexico, a strategic location that has become a hub for abortion tourism due to its proximity to Texas, where strong pro-life protections are in place. New Mexico’s lack of restrictions on abortion has made it a destination for those seeking to terminate pregnancies.
The pro-life organization has issued multiple cease-and-desist letters to the group’s leadership, including activist Hailey Walker, who maintains connections to the local Women’s March chapter. Despite clear documentation of copyright infringement, the abortion advocates have refused to comply with legal demands to stop using the modified logo.
“This represents a clear and willful violation of intellectual property rights,” states the latest legal notice from 40 Days for Life. The organization’s leadership has expressed readiness to pursue further legal action if necessary to protect their brand and message.
The situation highlights a stark contrast in approaches to women’s healthcare. While abortion advocates appropriate pro-life messaging, 40 Days for Life continues to provide tangible assistance to women in crisis pregnancies, including access to free medical care and practical support services. This comprehensive approach stands in direct opposition to the abortion industry’s singular focus on termination procedures.
Facts demonstrate that women who receive support from pro-life organizations often express gratitude for the alternatives presented during difficult circumstances. These organizations provide counseling, medical referrals, and material assistance without judgment or condemnation.
The legal confrontation underscores a broader ideological battle over women’s healthcare in America. While pro-life organizations expand their services to support women through pregnancy and beyond, abortion advocates increasingly resort to appropriating their opponents’ successful messaging strategies rather than developing original outreach methods.
As this legal challenge proceeds, it serves as a reminder that the abortion debate extends beyond philosophical differences to include practical questions of intellectual property rights and organizational integrity in advocacy work.
Related: White House Considers Cultural Assimilation Standards for Refugees
