Like a house built on sand, the Titan submersible was destined to fail from the start. A new federal investigation has revealed what many maritime experts long suspected – the vessel that claimed five lives last June was fundamentally unsafe due to inadequate engineering and testing.

The findings from the National Transportation Safety Board paint a troubling picture of a vessel that should never have carried passengers into the crushing depths of the North Atlantic. As someone who has covered maritime disasters for over four decades, this report stands out for its stark clarity about preventable failures.

The investigation found that OceanGate’s engineering process was fundamentally flawed, leading to a vessel that failed to meet basic strength and durability requirements. More concerning still, the company had no real understanding of the craft’s actual structural integrity, having skipped crucial testing phases that might have revealed fatal weaknesses.

The submersible imploded at a depth of 11,033 feet while attempting to visit the Titanic wreckage, claiming the lives of all five souls aboard, including the company’s chief executive. Each passenger had paid $250,000 for what they believed would be the adventure of a lifetime.

This brings to mind an old Texas saying: “All hat, no cattle.” The company marketed an impressive-sounding vessel – 22 feet long with a carbon fiber passenger compartment and titanium components. But beneath the technical specifications lay a deadly reality: the craft was operating with unknown damage that should have grounded it permanently.

The victims included renowned deep-sea explorer Paul-Henri Nargeolet, British adventurer Hamish Harding, businessman Shahzada Dawood and his 19-year-old son Suleman, and OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush. Their tragic deaths occurred roughly 372 miles off the coast of Newfoundland, in waters that hold both the Titanic’s remains and now the shattered dreams of another ill-fated voyage.

This report follows an equally damning U.S. Coast Guard investigation from August, which concluded the disaster was entirely preventable. Together, these findings reveal a pattern of critically flawed safety practices that prioritized profit and publicity over human life.

As we reflect on this tragedy, we’re reminded that the ocean demands respect, and engineering demands rigor. No amount of technological bravado can substitute for proper testing and safety protocols. The price of ignoring these fundamental truths was paid in human lives – a cost that no adventure, no matter how ambitious, could ever justify.

Courage and exploration have always carried risks, but there’s a profound difference between calculated risks and reckless endangerment. The Titan disaster falls squarely in the latter category, serving as a sobering reminder that in the unforgiving depths of the ocean, there is no room for cutting corners.

Related: Battle Brews Between Cities and White House Over Guard Authority