Karma bites off speaker of house, Pelosi’s Ass,withholding articles of impeachment from senate inadvertently acquit Trump of impeachment-Havard law prof.

10923
House

Hits: 11200

House-Senate Impeachment Impasse Would Mean Trump Wasn’t Impeached At All: Harvard Law Prof.

As Nancy Pelosi(speaker of house) keeps threatening to withhold the articles of impeachment passed Wednesday night by the House, Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman says that President Trump isn’t technically impeached until the House actually transmits the articles to the Senate for trials.

Prof. Feldman, who testified in front of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment proceedings earlier this month, argues in a Bloomberg Op-Ed that the framers’ definition of impeachment “assumed that impeachment was a process, not just a House vote,” and that “Strictly speaking, “impeachment” occurred – and occurs — when the articles of impeachment are presented to the Senate for trial.

And at that point, the Senate is obliged by the Constitution to hold a trial.”
House

If the House does not communicate its impeachment to the Senate, it hasn’t actually impeached the president. If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn’t truly impeached at all.

Trending:Nancy Pelosi loses out, Republican controlled senate going ahead to acquit Trump without Article of impeachment

IMPEACHMENT  under the US Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of impeachment to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached,only then is it viable.

Well,as for headlines we saw after the House vote reading, “TRUMP IMPEACHED,” those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement.

So far, the House has voted to impeach (future tense) Trump. He isn’t impeached (past tense) until the articles go to the Senate and the House members deliver the message said Noah Feldman.

Nancy Pelosi, meanwhile, won’t transmit the articles until the Senate holds what she considers a “fair” trial.

Please Click the link (here) to follow us for instant twitter updates

Thanks for reading,what do you think??please leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

12 COMMENTS

  1. Of course he is not impeached yet! Nobody is indicted until the prosecutor has given his APPLICATION for indictment to the court.

  2. Well no impeachment so all you lying media need to stop lying he’s not impeached nor will he be Trump 2020
    Trump 2024 for the years he worked and they wouldn’t recognize him he should get a do over just like they been doing to him first Russia collusion that didn’t work so they tried it over with Ukraine what’s next oh nothing cause it’s time to lock them up yea

  3. That Hag thought she could pull another one of her childish tricks. Looks like she tricked herself. Thats what happens when u try to destroy an innocent person. Stupid bitch

  4. The democrats are trying to look for a way around the Senate because they know they have no proof and it will look embarrassing for Pelosi and Schiff.

  5. After reading the constitution for myself I did not a law professor telling me that Trump was not impeached. As long as the House holds on to the their article’s of impeachment and does not deliver them to the Senate, President Trump is not impeachment. All they have done is to start a process of impeachment. That is as far as as it will go until it gets to the Senate. They’re fooling themselves if they believe the president is impeached. They can’t tell the senate how to conduct a trial. After all, the House did their impeachment proceedings behind closed doors and wound not let anyone in.

  6. This “law professor” was an asshole when he accused the president, and still is. He’s statements are made to challenge the democrats, and warn them, not help republicans. The president doesn’t need anything this Jerk has to say. The charges are bullshit with or without anything he says. He should stay in academia with his fellow liberals and kids who he can badger into believing whatever bullshit he has to spill out to them, and leave the constitutional law for people with more integrity.

  7. I agree with the Professor. A “trial” will require the whistleblower to be exposed. So far, evidentiary definitions applied declares the whistleblower does not exist. He is a ghost. A man/woman with no name. We have only Schiff words the whistleblower exists. Schiff had been known to deliberately lie on occasions. A trial requires presence of whistleblower. The delay in Articles to the Senate? Democrats having to produce a non-existing whistleblower. Democrats got away with it during hearings. Now Pelosi must locate a “loser”, an expendible Democrat to take the blame. The DNC must up the bribe money for a fall guy. If not, no impeachment articles. That alone makes Pelosi look foolish as well as a weak leader. But that is payback for allowing a person like Schiff to mislead her. He must covet the Speakership position. Killing two birds with one stone. Getting rid of President and Speaker. Pelosi is the sacrifice to his god for a more powerful congressional seat. Backstabbing? Nothing personal. He cannot get rid of the President though. A bigger God and Creator is divinely intervening on behalf of the President. Trump 2020.

  8. She won’t just be embarrassed, she might well be incarcerated as well for attempting (and leading an effort) to impeach an INNOCENT president. can you say “this is a coup?” she is trying to get Mike Pence impeached as well so she can become president and make all her troubles go away. Newsflash: her troubles aren’t going away but she is, for a very long time.

Leave a Reply