Courage is not measured solely on battlefields or in moments of historic consequence. Sometimes it shows itself in a Charlotte hospital room where a stabbing victim fights to recover from wounds that never should have been inflicted on American soil.
The suspect in this attack had already been shown the door, deported from this country through the legal process that exists precisely to protect citizens from those who prove themselves dangerous. Yet he returned, walking back across a border that has been treated with all the seriousness of a county line on a Sunday drive.
This is not complicated. A nation that cannot control who enters its territory is not truly sovereign. A government that will not defend its citizens from known threats has abandoned its most fundamental duty.
The victim survived, and we can be grateful for that single point of light in an otherwise dark tale of institutional failure. But gratitude does not erase the hard questions that demand answers. How does a deported criminal simply return? What sequence of policy decisions transformed border enforcement from a national priority into an afterthought?
President Trump addressed the incident directly, pointing to the deterioration of law and order in cities where local leadership has prioritized ideology over public safety. His statement on social media cut through the usual political deflection, asking what has happened to Charlotte and laying responsibility at the feet of those whose policies created the conditions for this attack.
The pattern has become numbingly familiar. During the previous administration, the southern border functioned more as a suggestion than a boundary. Deportation orders were challenged, delayed, or simply ignored. Sanctuary policies proliferated in cities across the nation, shielding individuals from federal immigration authorities regardless of their criminal histories. Every attempt to restore order was met with accusations of cruelty, as if enforcing the law somehow violated American values rather than protected them.
The people who designed and defended these policies never seem to appear when the consequences arrive. They are absent when families bury loved ones or when victims recover in hospital beds. Their compassion, so loudly proclaimed during policy debates, grows remarkably quiet when real harm befalls real people.
Consider the response when American forces recently struck narco-terrorist vessels threatening our shores. Critics immediately condemned the action as excessive, wringing their hands over rules of engagement and international perception. They wanted hesitation where decisiveness was required, preferring endless deliberation to effective defense.
That same mindset governs their approach to immigration enforcement. They treat deportation as inherently harsh, even when the individual being removed has demonstrated through criminal conduct that they pose a genuine threat. They elevate abstract principles above concrete safety, and then express shock when violence follows.
Every sanctuary policy carries an implicit calculation: that protecting illegal immigrants from deportation matters more than protecting citizens from crime. Every blocked enforcement action sends a message that the border is negotiable, that American law is optional for those who choose to ignore it.
The Charlotte victim will recover, we hope, and rebuild a life interrupted by violence that competent border enforcement would have prevented. But how many more such stories must accumulate before the architects of failure face accountability? How many preventable attacks must occur before we acknowledge that compassion without wisdom is simply negligence in disguise?
The solution remains straightforward. Secure the border. Enforce deportation orders. Support local law enforcement rather than obstruct it. Treat sovereignty as a prerequisite for safety rather than an outdated concept.
These are not radical proposals. They represent the baseline expectations that citizens have of their government. The fact that stating them plainly now counts as controversial reveals how far the conversation has drifted from common sense.
Charlotte deserves better. Every American community deserves better. And the time for excuses ended long before this latest attack proved, once again, that weak borders produce strong consequences.
Related: Trump Comments Reignite Debate Over Integration in Minneapolis Somali Enclave
