There are moments in American politics when even the most unlikely voices speak an uncomfortable truth. This appears to be one of those moments.
The Washington Post’s editorial board has issued a stark warning to California lawmakers: aggressive new taxes targeting the ultra-wealthy may accomplish the exact opposite of their intended purpose. Rather than filling state coffers, these policies could send billionaires packing, taking their tax dollars with them.
The editorial, published this week, carries a message that should resonate far beyond California’s borders. The board compared the state’s approach to taxation with the enthusiasm of teenage boys applying cologne. A little serves its purpose, but too much becomes repellent. It is a folksy analogy that cuts to the heart of a serious economic debate.
“Some taxes are necessary to pay for public services, but government eventually reaches the point of diminishing returns, then passes it into repulsion,” the editorial board wrote. These are words worth considering carefully, particularly as states across the nation grapple with budget shortfalls and growing demands on public services.
California voters may face a ballot initiative this November that would impose a five percent wealth tax on the state’s billionaires. The proposal comes despite clear evidence that previous tax increases on high-income households prompted many top earners to either leave the state entirely or restructure their finances to reduce taxable income.
The numbers tell a compelling story. Tech giants Larry Page, the cofounder of Google, and Peter Thiel, the cofounder of Palantir, have already adjusted their residencies in anticipation of a potential wealth tax passage. When billionaires start voting with their feet, state treasurers should take notice.
Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has demonstrated rare fiscal prudence by opposing the wealth tax. The Post’s editorial board praised this stance, noting that Newsom “understands it would kill the Golden State’s golden goose.” Credit where credit is due. The governor appears to recognize what economic history has taught repeatedly: capital is mobile, and wealthy individuals have options.
California’s tax structure already concentrates heavily on its wealthiest residents. This creates a precarious situation where the departure of even a handful of billionaires could blow a significant hole in state revenues. The state budget becomes hostage to the residency decisions of a relatively small number of individuals.
This is not merely a California problem. States across America are watching this experiment in real time. The question extends beyond tax policy into fundamental governance: How does a state balance its need for revenue with the reality that its wealthiest citizens can simply leave?
The Washington Post’s willingness to challenge progressive orthodoxy on this issue deserves recognition. The editorial board has chosen economic reality over ideological preference, a decision that speaks to the seriousness of California’s predicament.
The broader lesson applies nationwide. States compete for residents, businesses, and tax revenue. Policies that seem appealing in campaign speeches can produce devastating consequences when implemented. California stands at a crossroads, and the path it chooses will offer lessons for every statehouse in America.
The golden goose may not lay eggs forever, particularly if it decides to fly to a more hospitable climate.
Related: Seven Additional Countries Added to Travel Ban as Visa System Gets Major Reform
