Courage, it has been said, is doing what is right even when the powerful threaten to crush you for it. Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri now finds himself on the receiving end of one of the most audacious legal maneuvers in recent memory, a lawsuit that tells us more about the nature of authoritarian regimes than it does about American jurisprudence.
The People’s Republic of China, through its governmental entities in Wuhan, is demanding roughly $50 billion in damages from the Missouri Republican. Their grievance? Schmitt had the temerity to ask hard questions about the origins of COVID-19 when he served as his state’s attorney general.
The lawsuit names Schmitt, FBI co-deputy director Andrew Bailey, and the state of Missouri as defendants. The plaintiffs include the People’s Government of Wuhan Municipality, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology itself, the very facility that has been at the center of questions about the pandemic’s origins.
According to court documents, the Chinese government accuses these American officials of damaging the reputations of China, Wuhan, and its associated research facilities through what they term “malicious vexatious litigation, fabricating enormous disinformation, and spreading stigmatizing and discriminating slanders.”
Let that sink in for a moment. A foreign power is attempting to use American courts to punish an American elected official for actions he took while serving his constituents and seeking answers about a pandemic that killed over a million Americans.
This is not merely a legal curiosity. It represents something far more troubling, an attempt by an authoritarian government to weaponize our own judicial system against those who dare to question its narrative. The very concept strikes at the heart of American sovereignty and the independence of our elected representatives.
Schmitt filed his original lawsuit during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, when Americans were desperate for answers about how a novel coronavirus emerged from Wuhan and spread across the globe. Those questions remain largely unanswered, despite years of investigation and international pressure for transparency.
The Chinese Communist Party has consistently stonewalled international investigators, destroyed early samples, and silenced its own scientists who might shed light on the virus’s origins. Now, rather than providing the transparency the world has demanded, Beijing has chosen intimidation.
The $50 billion figure itself appears designed to send a message. It is not a reasonable calculation of actual damages but rather a number meant to shock and deter. The message to other American officials is clear: question us at your peril.
Whether this lawsuit will proceed in American courts remains to be seen. The legal barriers to such a case are substantial, including questions of jurisdiction and sovereign immunity. But the attempt itself reveals the lengths to which the Chinese government will go to silence its critics and control the narrative surrounding the pandemic.
Senator Schmitt’s original lawsuit sought accountability. China’s response seeks intimidation. The contrast could not be starker, or more telling.
Related: Biden Officials Dodge Questions on Afghan Vetting After National Guard Attack
