The wheels of government funding are turning once again on Capitol Hill, but there is trouble brewing that speaks to deeper divisions in how this country approaches border security and law enforcement.
Late Sunday night, House and Senate lawmakers unveiled a new federal spending package totaling roughly $80 billion. The legislation combines two of the twelve annual appropriations bills that keep the federal government running, covering the State Department, national security operations, federal financial services, and general government functions.
What is not in this package tells you everything you need to know about the current state of affairs in Washington. Funding for the Department of Homeland Security has been conspicuously left out, despite earlier expectations that it would be included in this round of appropriations.
The reason for this omission cuts straight to the heart of the border security debate that has consumed Washington and communities across America. Democrats are threatening to block DHS funding following an incident in Minneapolis where an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot a United States citizen in her vehicle.
The facts of what happened that day remain in dispute. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and other Republican officials maintain that the woman struck the agent with her vehicle, making the use of force justified and necessary. Democrats, on the other hand, are characterizing the incident as reckless and unprovoked, demanding significant reforms before they will support any funding for the department.
This standoff matters because of how the Senate operates. While the House can pass DHS funding with a simple majority, the Senate requires at least sixty votes for any spending legislation to advance. That mathematical reality means Democrats hold considerable leverage, and they appear willing to use it.
The package that was released totals just over $76 billion in federal funds and is expected to reach the House floor for a vote sometime this week. Within its pages, both parties are claiming victories that reflect their competing visions for America’s role in the world.
Republicans are highlighting the elimination of what they call wasteful spending on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, climate change mandates, and what they term divisive gender ideologies. The legislation includes $850 million for an “America First Opportunity Fund” designed to give the Secretary of State flexibility to respond to unforeseen international circumstances.
Democrats, meanwhile, are pointing to provisions they say support women globally, including protected funding for bilateral family planning and the United Nations Population Fund. They also secured $6.8 billion for a new account supporting activities previously funded under Development Assistance programs.
The bill also allocates millions in security assistance for Israel and Taiwan, along with other global partners.
House Republicans, under the leadership of Speaker Mike Johnson, are pressing forward with the appropriations process despite Democratic threats. The question now is whether this funding package can pass before the end of January deadline, or whether we are headed for yet another government shutdown showdown.
The larger question looming over all of this is what it says about our priorities as a nation. When funding for border security and immigration enforcement becomes a political football, when the safety of ICE agents and the security of our borders can be held hostage to partisan disputes, we have wandered far from the fundamental responsibilities of government.
The coming days will reveal whether cooler heads can prevail, or whether we are in for another round of brinkmanship that has become all too familiar in Washington.
Related: Suspicious Object at Palm Beach Airport Prompts Security Changes for Trump Departure
