Sometimes the stories that tell you the most about where we are as a nation are the ones that make both sides of the political aisle shake their heads in disbelief. This week brought us just such a moment.
The Democratic National Committee found itself in hot water with its own employees after Chairman Ken Martin announced that come February, the remote work experiment is over. Staff will be expected to show up at the office five days a week, just like Americans have done for generations before the pandemic changed everything.
The reaction was swift and, frankly, remarkable. During a Wednesday all-staff meeting where Martin delivered the news, workers both in the room and watching remotely expressed their displeasure. Those tuning in via video conference reportedly flooded the screen with thumbs-down emojis and other digital expressions of discontent. By day’s end, the DNC’s union had issued a statement calling the decision “callous” and “shocking.”
Now, here is where this story gets particularly interesting. The pushback against these complaints came not just from Republicans who might relish seeing Democrats squabble among themselves, but from prominent Democrats as well.
Neera Tanden, who served as President Biden’s domestic policy advisor, did not mince words. “If you think democracy is on the line, working in the office is not a big ask,” she wrote. “And there are plenty of other people willing to step up. Get yourselves together people.”
That is about as blunt as political commentary gets, especially when it comes from within your own party.
The union representing DNC staff, Local 500 of the Service Employees International Union, attempted to frame the issue around current economic conditions, claiming the policy change was particularly insensitive given circumstances created by the Trump administration. But that argument seemed to gain little traction, even among progressives.
The Center for New Liberalism, a left-leaning organization, made the case plainly. When you accept a position with a political campaign or organization like the DNC, your singular purpose is winning elections. These are demanding jobs requiring long hours and sacrifices. If remote work is non-negotiable, perhaps political organizing is not the right field.
Martin himself reportedly told employees that if they found the new policy unacceptable, they should seek employment elsewhere. The union called this remark “shocking,” but it reflects a reality that most American workers already understand. Employers set policies, and employees decide whether those terms work for them.
Sean Spicer, who certainly knows something about demanding hours from his time as press secretary during President Trump’s first term, also weighed in on the controversy with evident amusement.
Martin’s reasoning for the policy change carries weight. With the 2026 midterm elections approaching, he argued that in-person collaboration ensures staff will not miss critical decisions being made in real time. It also addresses concerns about information accessibility when team members work remotely.
The broader context matters here. While remote work became widely accepted during the pandemic, many companies ended the practice more than two years ago. President Trump ordered federal employees back to the office at the start of his second term, with termination as the consequence for non-compliance.
What makes this story worth noting is not just the policy itself, but what the reaction reveals. When both parties find common ground in criticizing workers who balk at showing up to the office, it suggests we may be reaching the end of the remote work era’s honeymoon period. The question now is whether the American workplace is returning to pre-pandemic norms, or whether this remains a point of ongoing contention.
For the DNC staff, February will bring their answer.
Related: California Woman Charged With Riot Conspiracy Following Attack on Turning Point USA Speaker
