The questions write themselves, and they deserve answers.
Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan, now running for the United States Senate, appeared on Somali television wearing a hijab during a visit to the Karmel Somali market. The timing raises eyebrows, coming as it does while Minnesota wrestles with a sprawling fraud scandal that has implicated members of the Somali community.
“The Somali community is part of the fabric of the state of Minnesota,” Flanagan told the camera, her head covered in the traditional Islamic garment typically worn by Muslim women as a sign of religious devotion and modesty.
Here is where the story gets interesting. Flanagan identifies as Catholic. Her own campaign website states that her “view on immigration is grounded in her Catholic faith.” Yet there she stood, adopting the religious dress of another faith tradition while seeking votes from a community currently at the center of a major fraud investigation.
The lieutenant governor faces a competitive Democratic primary to fill the seat being vacated by Senator Tina Smith. She will need to distinguish herself from her opponents while Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar continues serving in the state’s other Senate seat.
This is not Flanagan’s first brush with controversy over symbolic gestures. Last August, she appeared in a viral video wearing a shirt emblazoned with the words “Protect Trans Kids” alongside an image of a knife. In that same video, she delivered a message to parents: “When our children tell us who they are, it’s our job as grown-ups to listen and believe them.”
The pattern emerging here speaks to a broader political calculation. Flanagan appears willing to adopt whatever symbols or rhetoric might appeal to her target audience at any given moment, regardless of her stated religious convictions or the broader context surrounding those communities.
The fraud scandal engulfing parts of Minnesota’s Somali community represents one of the largest such investigations in state history. Federal and state authorities have been working to untangle allegations of widespread financial misconduct. Against this backdrop, a candidate for higher office choosing to don religious garments from that community while campaigning raises legitimate questions about political opportunism versus genuine solidarity.
Minnesota voters deserve a straight answer. Was this visit an authentic gesture of community engagement, or was it political theater designed to court a specific voting bloc? Does Flanagan believe that wearing a hijab demonstrates respect for the Somali community, or does it represent something closer to cultural appropriation from a Catholic candidate seeking political advantage?
The courage to ask these questions matters now more than ever. When candidates engage in symbolic acts that appear disconnected from their stated beliefs, voters have every right to demand clarity about motivations and intentions.
As this Senate race develops, Minnesotans will need to decide whether Flanagan’s approach represents the kind of leadership they want representing them in Washington. The primary election will test whether Democratic voters reward this style of campaigning or whether they seek something more substantive from their candidates.
One thing remains certain: in an era when authenticity has become political currency, actions like these invite scrutiny that no amount of careful messaging can deflect.
Related: Congress Flees Town as Health Care Premium Crisis Goes Unresolved
