The question before us is straightforward, but the implications run deep as a Texas oil well. Can states circumvent federal law to pursue their own political agendas against lawful industries? Two dozen Republican state attorneys general say the answer is no, and they are putting their legal weight behind that conviction.
Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen led a coalition of states filing amicus briefs Monday in support of gun manufacturers facing lawsuits in New York. The cases, brought by the cities of Buffalo and Rochester, along with a separate action involving New York Attorney General Letitia James, attempt to hold firearms makers and sellers liable for gun violence under the state’s public nuisance law.
Make no mistake about what is happening here. This legal maneuvering represents an attempt to accomplish through the courts what has failed in the legislature, a strategy that should concern Americans regardless of their position on the Second Amendment.
“These cases go far beyond New York,” Knudsen explained in an interview. “This is not just a New York thing by any stretch of the imagination. It affects all of us.”
The attorneys general argue that New York’s efforts violate federal law specifically designed to protect the firearms industry from such liability claims. That protection exists because Congress recognized that manufacturers of legal products should not be held responsible for the criminal misuse of those products by third parties. The principle is sound. We do not sue automobile manufacturers when drunk drivers cause fatalities, nor do we hold kitchen knife makers liable for stabbings.
What makes this legal battle particularly significant is the national precedent it could set. Knudsen noted that blue states and gun control advocates have repeatedly attempted to “get around” federal law and “go after and bankrupt firearms companies.” The strategy is transparent. If you cannot ban guns outright, regulate them into oblivion. If you cannot regulate them sufficiently, sue the manufacturers into bankruptcy.
The timing of these legal actions deserves scrutiny as well. They come as New York faces its own fiscal challenges. Governor Kathy Hochul, a Democrat, recently acknowledged that the state’s tax base has “eroded” and admitted that New York is competing with other states that “have less of a tax burden.” Perhaps state officials might better serve their constituents by addressing the policies driving businesses and residents to flee rather than pursuing politically motivated lawsuits against lawful industries.
The Trump administration has also taken notice of these developments, making new criminal referrals to the Department of Justice targeting James’ office, though the details of those referrals remain under wraps.
The fundamental issue transcends partisan politics or even gun rights. It concerns whether states can selectively ignore federal law to advance their political objectives. It asks whether industries operating within the bounds of legality can be destroyed through litigation simply because their products are disfavored by certain officials.
The coalition of Republican attorneys general understands that allowing New York to succeed in this endeavor would open the floodgates. Today it might be gun manufacturers. Tomorrow it could be energy companies, pharmaceutical firms, or any industry that falls out of political favor in certain jurisdictions.
The courts will ultimately decide these cases, but the stakes could hardly be higher. Federal law exists for a reason, and that reason includes preventing individual states from undermining industries that operate lawfully across the entire nation.
Related: ICE Agents Deploy to Marine Corps Graduation as Military Tightens Base Security
