Courage, as they say, is doing what is right even when it is difficult. And right now, the men and women of Immigration and Customs Enforcement need courage just to show up for work.
A federal judge in Los Angeles delivered a significant victory Monday for the Trump administration and federal immigration officers, blocking California from enforcing laws that would have required ICE agents to unmask while performing their duties. Judge Christina Snyder, appointed during the Clinton administration, ruled that California’s legislation violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution by discriminating against the federal government.
The decision comes at a critical juncture. Death threats against ICE officers have surged by a staggering 8,000 percent, while physical assaults on these federal agents have jumped by 1,347 percent. These are not mere statistics on a page. These numbers represent real people doing a difficult job, now facing unprecedented danger simply for enforcing the nation’s immigration laws.
The ruling addresses two California statutes: SB 627, misleadingly titled the “No Secret Police Act,” and SB 805, called the “No Vigilantes Act.” The federal government brought suit against California Governor Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Robert Bonta, arguing these laws were designed to hamper federal immigration enforcement.
Consider the bitter irony at play here. The same California officials who mandated masks for schoolchildren, restaurant workers, and everyday citizens during the pandemic now insist that federal officers must expose their identities while facing violent threats. The same state government that claims to champion worker safety wants to strip protection from officers confronting dangerous criminals.
The judge found that California’s laws impermissibly single out federal immigration enforcement for discriminatory treatment. This is not about transparency or accountability. It is about making it easier for activists to identify, track, and threaten federal officers and their families.
The pattern is clear and disturbing. Leftist activists have systematically worked to dox ICE agents, publishing their personal information online and targeting not just the officers themselves but their families. Hotels housing immigration officers have faced violent protests. Officers have been followed home. Their children have been threatened.
Meanwhile, California Democrats have worked to shield illegal aliens arrested for serious offenses. Under current California policy, drug trafficking, distribution of child pornography, burglary, fraud, embezzlement, solicitation of minors, and human smuggling all fall under the category of “non-violent crimes” that supposedly do not warrant cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Let that sink in for a moment. California officials are more concerned about protecting the identities of foreign nationals who have violated American law than they are about protecting federal officers enforcing that law.
Judge Snyder’s ruling recognizes what should be obvious to anyone operating in good faith: federal officers facing unprecedented threats have a legitimate need to protect their identities. The Supremacy Clause exists precisely to prevent states from interfering with legitimate federal functions through targeted, discriminatory legislation.
This decision will not end the debate over immigration enforcement, but it does establish an important principle. States cannot weaponize their laws to hamstring federal officers doing dangerous work. The Constitution still means something, even in California.
Related: Health Secretary Declares Beef Is Back as Dietary Guidelines Shift Focus
