Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who is leaving the Senate soon, seems to be holding a grudge towards her former party, which she believes threw her under the bus.
Sinema, who had to face the far-left lunatic Ruben Galego in the primaries, was forced to leave her post as she saw no way of winning. Gallego, who ultimately defeated Republican Kari Lake, is waiting to be seated as a member of Congress in January.
Why did the Democratic Party turn against Sinema? All it comes down to is the filibuster. She stood up to the Biden administration, and Democrats in the Senate, who wanted to eliminate the filibuster in order to pass their radical agenda.
So you can imagine the soon-to-be former senator was not impressed by Sen. Chuck Schumer’s sudden post-election interest in “bipartisanship.” She took to social media to drag him.
Right on. Schumer can’t call for bipartisanship after he has spent the last four years ramming various left-wing lunacies through party-line voting. If he had his way, the filibuster and other terrible policies would have passed. This includes adding new states to try to cement a majority. Sinema is in a position to expose his nonsense as she leaves the Senate.
Naturally, liberals who replied to her were not too pleased with the dig. Overall, I think they’re not taking their loss of election very well.
They’re so mad and I am here to witness it all. You know that things are bad when they bring up slavery, a Democratic Party institution by the way. It would be great if one of these people could explain to me why Sinema was able to get Trump elected. She did not run for reelection and allowed Democrats to be as crazy as they wanted. It was not the protection of the filibuster that got Trump elected.
I’ll be honest. I will miss Sinema. She’s liberal, and I don’t always agree with her, but she embodied the type of senator that we need to see more of. Power can blind people and make them believe that they will achieve their utopia if they push just a little bit further. It’s not going to happen and keeping the filibuster is good for our country.
Everyone benefits from less Washington. We don’t want a Congress that can make dramatic, sweeping changes to the country based on a few percentage point win. This is how the tyranny by the majority leads to internal unrest.
Although it may not be popular on the right, given that we just won an overwhelmingly resounding victory, strengthening the filibuster, and not eliminating it, is the correct move. The government cannot do anything for me. The behemoth would rather stay out of the way and never return. This would be bad news for Democrats if they were to take over. Republicans need to use all their leverage now to prevent this from happening.
