The story unfolding in Minnesota carries the weight of a scandal that should trouble every American who cares about how their tax dollars are spent. Under Governor Tim Walz’s watch, a massive Medicaid fraud scheme has been allowed to fester, and now Democrats in Congress find themselves in an uncomfortable position when asked who should answer for it.
The numbers are staggering, and the questions are straightforward. Yet the responses from Democratic lawmakers reveal a party uncertain about how to handle one of their own when accountability comes knocking.
Representative Johnny Olszewski of Maryland offered what might be called the most direct response among his colleagues. He acknowledged that any instance of fraud demands investigation and prosecution to the fullest extent. States bear an obligation to administer these programs properly, he noted, and when they fail, people should face consequences.
When pressed on whether Governor Walz should be compelled to testify before Congress about how so much money vanished under his leadership, Olszewski suggested that anyone involved in large-scale fraud should come before Congress and explain what happened. It was not quite a ringing endorsement for holding Walz accountable, but neither was it the dodge that other Democrats employed.
Representative Becca Balint of Vermont took a different tack entirely. She insisted that fraud is not a partisan issue and expressed a wish that everyone could focus on facts rather than political fighting. It was the kind of answer that sounds reasonable on its surface but manages to avoid the central question entirely.
Then there was Representative Glenn Ivey of Maryland, who performed what can only be described as political gymnastics. Rather than address the fraud that occurred in Minnesota, he pivoted to attacking the Trump administration for eliminating positions in the Department of Justice’s civil fraud division and firing inspectors general throughout the federal government.
The irony is rich. Democrats are being asked about fraud that happened under a Democratic governor’s administration, and some choose to blame President Trump instead of addressing the failure of oversight that allowed billions in taxpayer money to disappear.
The Minnesota scandal involves Medicaid dollars that were supposed to serve vulnerable populations. Instead, they lined the pockets of fraudsters while state officials apparently looked the other way. This is not a theoretical problem or a partisan talking point. Real money intended for real people was stolen, and it happened on Governor Walz’s watch.
The question facing Democrats is simple: Do they believe in accountability when it applies to their own, or only when they can use it as a weapon against political opponents? Some, like Olszewski, appear willing to at least acknowledge that serious questions need answering. Others seem more interested in changing the subject or spreading blame around until it becomes so diffuse that no one can be held responsible.
The American people deserve better than deflection. They deserve leaders who will stand up and demand answers when billions of dollars go missing, regardless of which party controls the governor’s mansion. Fraud is fraud, whether it happens in a red state or a blue one.
Governor Walz should testify. The facts should be laid bare. And if accountability means anything at all, those responsible should face consequences. Anything less makes a mockery of the public trust.
Related: Obamacare Premium Increases Set to Hit Millions as Congress Points Fingers
