The truth about what is happening on America’s southern border runs deeper and darker than most Americans realize, and it extends far beyond the humanitarian crisis we see in our news feeds.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat down for a frank discussion this week that ought to make every American sit up and take notice. He laid bare not just the collapse at our border, but the dangerous chess game being played by hostile foreign powers right in our hemisphere.
The numbers alone tell a grim story. More than eight million Venezuelans have fled their country under the iron grip of socialist dictator Nicolás Maduro. That exodus has overwhelmed neighboring nations and contributed significantly to the surge of migrants reaching our southern border. But as Rubio made clear, the humanitarian dimension is only part of the equation.
What should alarm us most is the foothold Iran has established in Venezuela. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and even Hezbollah have embedded themselves in South America, using Venezuela as what Rubio termed an “anchor” sanctuary. This reality receives precious little attention from the mainstream press, yet it represents a strategic threat to American security that cannot be ignored.
Rubio pulled no punches in his assessment of how we arrived at this dangerous juncture. The Biden administration, he explained, believed it could negotiate with Maduro in good faith. That belief proved catastrophically wrong.
The deal was straightforward on paper. Maduro demanded the release of his nephews, both convicted drug traffickers, from American prisons. He also wanted his chief money launderer freed from custody before trial. In exchange, Venezuela’s strongman promised to hold free and fair elections.
“He got the nephews back, the drug dealers. He got the bag man back. And he never did the free and fair elections,” Rubio said. In other words, Maduro “suckered Joe Biden.”
The secretary of state made clear that such manipulation will not work with the current administration, declaring firmly that “they’re not going to sucker Donald Trump.”
Beyond the geopolitical maneuvering, Rubio addressed a harder truth about border security that politicians often dance around. The vetting process for migrants has inherent limitations that no amount of bureaucratic procedure can overcome.
“You can only vet information that exists,” Rubio explained with refreshing candor. In many countries plagued by terrorism or lacking functioning governments, documentation simply does not exist or cannot be verified. Even someone with no extremist history could be radicalized after arriving in America, particularly if they struggle to integrate or fall prey to propaganda in their native language.
The recent shooting in Washington that killed one National Guardsman and wounded another underscores this danger. The alleged shooter, an Afghan national, was reportedly radicalized through connections he maintained in Afghanistan after entering the United States.
Rubio’s conclusion carried the weight of uncomfortable reality. “The bottom line is there is no effective way to allow hundreds of thousands of people to enter any country in the world and not face consequences.”
This is the conversation America needs to have. Not the sanitized talking points or the politically correct evasions, but the hard truths about what happens when borders become suggestions rather than boundaries. The Venezuelan regime is failing, hostile powers are exploiting that failure, and the consequences are washing up on American soil.
The question now is whether we have the resolve to confront these realities before the bill comes due in ways we cannot afford to pay.
Related: Unusual Congressional Alliance Targets Vast Web of Federal Criminal Regulations
