There is an old saying in politics that success has many fathers, but failure is an orphan. What we are witnessing in Virginia turns that notion on its head in a way that would make even the most seasoned political observers shake their heads.
Democratic Governor Abigail Spanberger stood before cameras this week to announce what she characterized as major economic victories for the Commonwealth of Virginia. The governor touted legislation authorizing four separate investments from the aerospace, energy, and pharmaceutical industries. By her account, these deals would bring 3,250 new jobs and $7.1 billion in business investment to Virginia.
“From my very first day in office, I have been working to create a stable business environment so companies can hire, expand, and continue to invest in our Commonwealth,” Spanberger declared in her press release. She went on to say she was signing these bills into law to continue growing Virginia’s economy and create opportunities for Virginians.
The truth, however, tells a different story.
These investments were not the fruit of Spanberger’s labor. Rather, they were the culmination of extensive groundwork laid by her Republican predecessor, Glenn Youngkin. The governor’s signature on these bills amounted to little more than a formality, the final stamp on deals that were already done.
During his tenure, Youngkin pursued an aggressive economic development strategy that yielded remarkable results. His administration secured $156 billion in total commitments from chief executives, a figure that exceeds the combined achievements of the previous six gubernatorial administrations. Let that sink in for a moment. One governor accomplished more than six of his predecessors combined.
These are not small numbers we are discussing. These are transformative investments that will shape Virginia’s economic landscape for generations to come. The jobs created, the businesses attracted, and the infrastructure developed did not materialize overnight, nor did they spring forth from Spanberger’s first days in office.
Republican leaders have not taken kindly to what they view as an attempt to rewrite recent history. The former governor and his allies have called out what they characterize as a blatant attempt to claim credit where credit is not due.
The situation raises important questions about political integrity and honest governance. When a public official takes credit for the work of others, particularly a political opponent, it erodes public trust. Voters deserve to know who is actually responsible for the policies and achievements that affect their lives.
This is not merely a matter of hurt feelings or political gamesmanship. It speaks to a broader pattern we have seen across the country, where new administrations attempt to rebrand or claim ownership of their predecessors’ successes while distancing themselves from any failures.
The people of Virginia are not naive. They remember who was working to bring these businesses to their state. They remember who was meeting with corporate leaders and negotiating these deals. They remember who created the business-friendly environment that made these investments possible.
Governor Spanberger may have signed the papers, but Governor Youngkin built the foundation. That distinction matters, and it should not be forgotten in the rush to claim political victories.
Related: Minnesota Loses Court Fight Over Frozen Medicaid Funds as Anti-Fraud Push Gains Steam
